With Saudi Arabia announcing plans for a major restructuring of the kingdom’s economy and Iran gearing up to become a regional hegemony, women’s sports are emerging as a benchmark of reform, and one that so far is less than promising.
Saudi Arabia’s recent outline of plans for large scale economic reform away from the kingdom’s dependency on oil acknowledges that women have a role to play but comes nowhere close to assigning them a fully-fledged or unrestricted part to play.
In a slick document, entitled Vision 2030 that was drafted by Western consultants, Saudi Arabia identifies sports “as a mainstay of a healthy and balanced lifestyle and promises to encourage widespread and regular participation in sports and athletic activities”. Yet, the document makes no reference to facilities for women in a country that has so far refrained from introducing physical education for girls in primary and secondary schools.
Similarly, the document, amid leaks that the kingdom’s powerful Deputy Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman favours the lifting of a ban on women’s driving in due course, promises enhanced education and job opportunities for women, who account for more than half of the country’s university graduates. But it only envisions a mere 8% increase from 22% to 30% in women’s participation in the workforce.
The document lays out a vision of economic reform with no reference to political reform despite the government’s unilateral rewriting of the kingdom’s social contract that undermines the surrender of personal and political freedoms in exchange for cradle-to-grave social welfare. Social change appears geared towards what is deemed minimally necessary for economic reform in a bid to postpone, for as long as possible, potential conflict with the kingdom’s powerful, ultra-conservative Wahhabi clergy that dictates norms of social behaviour.
As a result, the document in propagating sports makes no mention of complying with demands from the International Olympic Committee (IOC) and human rights groups that women, who under pressure of the IOC participated for the first time in the kingdom’s history in 2012 in Olympic Games, be allowed to compete in disciplines that are not mentioned in the Quran.
Nor does it acknowledge the economic benefits argued by the Saudi Arabian Football Association president Ahmed Al-Harbi that the kingdom could reap from allowing women to attend men’s sporting events. Repeated suggestions to either build stadiums that would have segregated sections for women or renovate existing ones to accommodate women have been defeated by the clergy and an unwillingness of the government to confront the conservatives.
The document’s hesitancy to tackle social and political reforms that will have to support inevitable economic reform raises questions about the government’s ability to turn Saudi Arabia into a 21st century, diversified-knowledge economy that would be able to nurture a private sector and a technocracy capable of playing its part and attracting the necessary foreign investment.
Sports may not be a central pillar of economic reform. It was however important enough to be highlighted in the government’s Vision 2030. Saudi Arabia’s plans to turn its economy around is driven by perceptions of the end of oil and tumbling commodity prices that force the government to restructure its sources of income. Past failed efforts to do so were the result of a less pressing need and the willingness of the international community to endorse a regime that refused to adhere to human rights, including those of women. The result has been the spread of a backward looking, intolerant, and puritan interpretation of Islam that has made its mark globally and at times has become a breeding ground for Islamist militancy.
International sporting associations have played their part in this complacency and continue to do so. The associations’ efforts to further women’s sporting rights lack resolve and forcefulness not only in their attitude towards Saudi Arabia but also towards Iran, the world’s only other country that bans women from attending male sporting events. Yet, both Saudi Arabia and Iran, given their need for international contributions to their economic turn-arounds, may be more susceptible to pressure than they have been in the past.
Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 by implication lays out multiple areas where foreign investment and know-how will be needed. Iran is embarking on massive rehabilitation following the recent lifting of punitive economic sanctions as part of its nuclear agreement with world powers and is seeking to re-establish itself as a regional hegemony. Saudi Arabia has, however, yet to follow Iran and other Middle Eastern and North African nations in seriously seeking to project itself internationally by hosting major sporting events.
Iranian efforts so far have focussed on soccer and volleyball. The International Volleyball Federation (FIVB) have nonetheless backed away in recent days from its earlier insistence that Iran allow women to watch men’s matches if it wants to be awarded hosting rights. It did so after its efforts failed to persuade Iran to lift the ban for this year’s Kish Island Open leg of the Beach Volleyball World Tour. The FIVB back-down is all the more curious given that volleyball constitutes a hardening of Iran’s position. In contrast to the ban on women attending soccer matches that dates back to the 1979 Islamic revolution, women were only barred from volleyball events in 2012.
The FIVB had vowed in 2014 to not award further events to Iran following the arrest of British-Iranian national Ghoncheh Ghavami on charges of waging “propaganda against the regime” for attempting to attend an attending an FIVB World League match in Tehran. Ms. Ghavami spent 151 days in Tehran’s notorious Evin prison before she was released and charges eventually dropped.
The FIVB has since concluded that Iran’s complex religious politics make it unlikely that firm pressure will produce results. Like the IOC, it has opted for an ad-hoc approach with little evidence that there is greater hope for success. “Volleyball is not relevant enough for the government to set a precedent and change… At least by allowing Iran to host events, the conditions for people to express their views and opposition are there… We would be punishing a whole generation of athletes trying to get into the sport by not holding any events in Iran,” said an FIVB official.
The FIVB is, however, unlikely to have any more success as it seeks to persuade Iran to allow women to attend the FIVB World League in Iran in July.
Ultimately, achieving women’s rights is a struggle that has to be waged domestically in Saudi Arabia and Iran. The crackdowns on dissent in both countries hold out little hope that international sporting events will spark the kind of debate that leads to change. The battle between recalcitrant governments and international sporting associations is one that has greater resolve and the longer breath. That is a battle that, for now despite their vulnerabilities, the governments in Riyadh and Tehran are winning.
Dr. James M. Dorsey is a senior fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, co-director of the University of Würzburg’s Institute for Fan Culture, and the author of The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer blog and a just published book with the same title.